<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Kill 102 Minutes!</title>
	<link>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/113</link>
	<description>David Hayward is an artist trapped inside a pastor's body.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: silverfoot</title>
		<link>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/113#comment-650</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/113#comment-650</guid>
					<description>Fred took the words out of my mouth, re: Frazetta/Vallejo. ahh, makes me nostalgic for the days i used to sneak into my brother's room and read his Conan comics when he wasn't home. *grin*

i haven't seen the flick, but just *try* to tell me the costumes didn't rock! it was a Canadian company, Valentine Armouries (out of Calgary) that did the weapons armour.

and about the horses... i wonder, because i know Arabian horses are much larger (well, taller, and more elegantly boned) than those that used to be (i.e. 1000 years ago) on the european and nordic continents. could it have been an attempt (however lame) at historical authenticity? (and could my comment be any more parenthetical?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred took the words out of my mouth, re: Frazetta/Vallejo. ahh, makes me nostalgic for the days i used to sneak into my brother&#8217;s room and read his Conan comics when he wasn&#8217;t home. *grin*</p>
<p>i haven&#8217;t seen the flick, but just *try* to tell me the costumes didn&#8217;t rock! it was a Canadian company, Valentine Armouries (out of Calgary) that did the weapons armour.</p>
<p>and about the horses&#8230; i wonder, because i know Arabian horses are much larger (well, taller, and more elegantly boned) than those that used to be (i.e. 1000 years ago) on the european and nordic continents. could it have been an attempt (however lame) at historical authenticity? (and could my comment be any more parenthetical?)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/113#comment-609</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/113#comment-609</guid>
					<description>Brian! Brilliant movie you refer to!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian! Brilliant movie you refer to!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fred</title>
		<link>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/113#comment-584</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/113#comment-584</guid>
					<description>...although stylistically I prefer Vallejo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;although stylistically I prefer Vallejo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fred</title>
		<link>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/113#comment-581</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/113#comment-581</guid>
					<description>I know who Frazetta is, hence the "winkie."  I figured most might not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know who Frazetta is, hence the &#8220;winkie.&#8221;  I figured most might not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
