<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: natural science &#038; theological science</title>
	<link>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/243</link>
	<description>david hayward is an artist trapped inside an pastor's body</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: churchpundit</title>
		<link>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/243#comment-1393</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/243#comment-1393</guid>
					<description>Thanks Fred. You're on to something I think.
Henry: I have to disagree. Theology IS a science. It isn't natural science, but there are other kinds of sciences. Simply defined, a science is "any activity that is the object of careful study or that is carried out according to a developed method on a certain subject." That would include theology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Fred. You&#8217;re on to something I think.<br />
Henry: I have to disagree. Theology IS a science. It isn&#8217;t natural science, but there are other kinds of sciences. Simply defined, a science is &#8220;any activity that is the object of careful study or that is carried out according to a developed method on a certain subject.&#8221; That would include theology.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Henry</title>
		<link>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/243#comment-1391</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/243#comment-1391</guid>
					<description>Ridiculous statements.  Theology is not and will never be science.  

You obviously recognize the need to address the problems that a scientific assessment of God presents.  Trying to adopt "science language" to address these problems does not work and does nothing more than make you look like an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculous statements.  Theology is not and will never be science.  </p>
<p>You obviously recognize the need to address the problems that a scientific assessment of God presents.  Trying to adopt &#8220;science language&#8221; to address these problems does not work and does nothing more than make you look like an idiot.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fred</title>
		<link>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/243#comment-1390</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nakedpastor.com/archives/243#comment-1390</guid>
					<description>Any interpretation of "nature" as well as the Bible is based on preconceptions--be they naturalistic preconceptions or theistic preconceptions.  It never hurts to acknowledge whatever preconception you're interpreting from and qualify your interpretation accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any interpretation of &#8220;nature&#8221; as well as the Bible is based on preconceptions&#8211;be they naturalistic preconceptions or theistic preconceptions.  It never hurts to acknowledge whatever preconception you&#8217;re interpreting from and qualify your interpretation accordingly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
