May I add that the Pharisees controlled the narrative at the time of Jesus, and the Romans controlled the pitch, tone, and pacing of the āofficial pressā.
But Jesus created a platform, and in Matthew Chapter 23, we still read His observations to this day.
Ever read a good book by or about the āleader of the Phariseesā [Luke 14:1]? No?
Ever read a good book by Pilate the Governor [Matt 27]? Nope, me neither.
The books of the submergent will simply pass away. But the dialog that you and others are creating will probably continue to be read.
I cannot imagine that any Christian University would endorse their books or their life-style of silencing and avoidance (āthe priest and Levite walked on the other sideā¦ā).
However, I believe that those Universities will be focusing on you and the other āSamaritansā that offered voice to both sides.
You and the other Samaritans will be read and studied, because you showed the Second Commandment in action.
David,
You speak with integrity. You have acted with utmost respect and consideration. Youāre the one of the few trailblazers. Perhaps for the moment, the narrative is going exactly where it needs to goā¦ to the wounded and the healers and the wounded healers.
Perhaps for the moment, it is less about educating those who arenāt interesting in listening. Itās more about strengthening and inspiring those that are seeking their opportunity to rise up.
Itās so disappointing when people who portray themselves as advocates for the abused really understand zilch about abuse dynamics.
If every word that came out of Julieās mouth has been a lie (ITāS NOT! There is tons of evidence, particularly at RL Stollarās site, and even if there was none, victims deserve to be listened to and not silenced!), the silencing, the denial, the hypocrisy in how this situation has been dealt with compared to how other abusers were talked about publicly on the platforms of people now saying, āLet the courts handles it,ā is deafening. Itās maddening. Itās heartbreaking.
I love so much of Rachel Held Evans, Brian McLaren, and Nadia Bolz-Weberās work. They have incredible insights on a number of issues. Which is why itās even more devastating to realize that while they give the issue of abuse in the church lip service, THEY. DONāT. GET. IT. And it seems like no amount of pleading, āHey, what youāre doing really hurts and triggers other abuse victims,ā is going to get through.
Rachel likes to talk about what happened with World Vision last year as a day that many in the evangelical community decided they were done with evangelicalism.
The day she continued to contradict her every previous statement about the right to publicly comment on abuse allegations was the day I was done with āprogressives.ā
David, I hear what youāre saying and I understand why youāre wording this blog post in this manner. But allow me to disagree..slightly..with just a different perspective.
You said they arenāt allowing people like us to join their table to have conversation. I can see why this seems true for many. But let me explain something about people like that. They arenāt hosting the conversation. YOU ARE. They have silenced the conversation at their table. So thereās no point in joining a conversation that doesnāt exist over there. Youāre hosting, itās your table, keep the conversation going. This isnāt just about Tony and the submergent (I like that term). Itās about a much bigger conversation about the cover up tactics that all abusers use. We can draw on several examples over the centuries, just read the court transcript of Anne Hutchinson during early America. Jesus wasnāt about covering up abuse. He exposed it! He covered wounds, he healed them, he showed compassion and called out the self righteous and serpent tongues of religious leaders.
About the narrative.. they arenāt truly controlling the narrative. Where thereās no voice, thereās no narrative. They arenāt really controlling it, they just arenāt hosting it at all. But you are. The ones who do the talking are speaking the narrative. Keep speaking.
While Julie might be controlled by legal bullying (sad thing huh?), they canāt silence everyone. The fact that they try to silence people is a tell tale sign of manipulation and Jesus was not into manipulation.
I, for one, have no interest in joining their table. I donāt want to even try to approach a table that pays no attention to the wounded. I donāt want to be rubbing elbows with so called leaders who silence the stories of the abused. They like to sit at their lofty tables and rub elbows with one another and count their profits. Thatās not the way of Jesus. They arenāt being leaders. A true leader doesāt silence the story of Christās redemptive power in the lives of victims. They shine a light on His Story and how it plays out in our lives.
So while I disagree slightly (sort of), Iām actually agreeing with you 100%.
Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
29 comments
Great insights! And I agree with Lisa!
May I add that the Pharisees controlled the narrative at the time of Jesus, and the Romans controlled the pitch, tone, and pacing of the āofficial pressā.
But Jesus created a platform, and in Matthew Chapter 23, we still read His observations to this day.
Ever read a good book by or about the āleader of the Phariseesā [Luke 14:1]? No?
Ever read a good book by Pilate the Governor [Matt 27]? Nope, me neither.
The books of the submergent will simply pass away. But the dialog that you and others are creating will probably continue to be read.
I cannot imagine that any Christian University would endorse their books or their life-style of silencing and avoidance (āthe priest and Levite walked on the other sideā¦ā).
However, I believe that those Universities will be focusing on you and the other āSamaritansā that offered voice to both sides.
You and the other Samaritans will be read and studied, because you showed the Second Commandment in action.
David,
You speak with integrity. You have acted with utmost respect and consideration. Youāre the one of the few trailblazers. Perhaps for the moment, the narrative is going exactly where it needs to goā¦ to the wounded and the healers and the wounded healers.
Perhaps for the moment, it is less about educating those who arenāt interesting in listening. Itās more about strengthening and inspiring those that are seeking their opportunity to rise up.
Itās so disappointing when people who portray themselves as advocates for the abused really understand zilch about abuse dynamics.
If every word that came out of Julieās mouth has been a lie (ITāS NOT! There is tons of evidence, particularly at RL Stollarās site, and even if there was none, victims deserve to be listened to and not silenced!), the silencing, the denial, the hypocrisy in how this situation has been dealt with compared to how other abusers were talked about publicly on the platforms of people now saying, āLet the courts handles it,ā is deafening. Itās maddening. Itās heartbreaking.
I love so much of Rachel Held Evans, Brian McLaren, and Nadia Bolz-Weberās work. They have incredible insights on a number of issues. Which is why itās even more devastating to realize that while they give the issue of abuse in the church lip service, THEY. DONāT. GET. IT. And it seems like no amount of pleading, āHey, what youāre doing really hurts and triggers other abuse victims,ā is going to get through.
Rachel likes to talk about what happened with World Vision last year as a day that many in the evangelical community decided they were done with evangelicalism.
The day she continued to contradict her every previous statement about the right to publicly comment on abuse allegations was the day I was done with āprogressives.ā
David, I hear what youāre saying and I understand why youāre wording this blog post in this manner. But allow me to disagree..slightly..with just a different perspective.
You said they arenāt allowing people like us to join their table to have conversation. I can see why this seems true for many. But let me explain something about people like that. They arenāt hosting the conversation. YOU ARE. They have silenced the conversation at their table. So thereās no point in joining a conversation that doesnāt exist over there. Youāre hosting, itās your table, keep the conversation going. This isnāt just about Tony and the submergent (I like that term). Itās about a much bigger conversation about the cover up tactics that all abusers use. We can draw on several examples over the centuries, just read the court transcript of Anne Hutchinson during early America. Jesus wasnāt about covering up abuse. He exposed it! He covered wounds, he healed them, he showed compassion and called out the self righteous and serpent tongues of religious leaders.
About the narrative.. they arenāt truly controlling the narrative. Where thereās no voice, thereās no narrative. They arenāt really controlling it, they just arenāt hosting it at all. But you are. The ones who do the talking are speaking the narrative. Keep speaking.
While Julie might be controlled by legal bullying (sad thing huh?), they canāt silence everyone. The fact that they try to silence people is a tell tale sign of manipulation and Jesus was not into manipulation.
I, for one, have no interest in joining their table. I donāt want to even try to approach a table that pays no attention to the wounded. I donāt want to be rubbing elbows with so called leaders who silence the stories of the abused. They like to sit at their lofty tables and rub elbows with one another and count their profits. Thatās not the way of Jesus. They arenāt being leaders. A true leader doesāt silence the story of Christās redemptive power in the lives of victims. They shine a light on His Story and how it plays out in our lives.
So while I disagree slightly (sort of), Iām actually agreeing with you 100%.